Search for: "Samsung"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 6,706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Samsung, you generally get the chance to take depositions, argue motions, handle arbitrations, mediations and settlement conferences–in short, lawyering–from your very first day. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 10:21 am
Also, the ITC is reviewing a preliminary ruling on Samsung's complaint against Apple, which raises FRAND issues. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:26 am
Lakshminarayanan, Samsung· Nilesh Puntambekar, Emerson Innovation Center· Akhilesh K Gupta, President, Patent Agents Association of India· Dr Beatrice Striner, Université NeuchâtelDon’t miss this opportunity to register your place and join your peers who are leading India innovation and growth. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:07 pm
I don't see any indication that Samsung had received an advance warning in this regard. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 7:27 pm
Korea’s Woori Bank Lawsuit against Merrill/Bank of America Dismissed Korean Tourism Infrastructure Improving: Special Act for the Expansion of Tourism Accommodation Environmental Impact Statements in Korea: New Korean Environmental Impact Assessment Regime Protecting Trade Secrets in Korea: Top 5 Things to Know Before Subjecting your Business Secrets to the Korean Market Korea’s President Lee to Pardon Cronies and “Too Big to Fail’ Companies Sad News for a… [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:29 pm
And that would be much worse than the Ericsson-Samsung dispute because there wouldn't even be two wrongs (that don't make a right anyway) but there would be only one wrong, and only one party that is unfairly harmed on the basis of SEPs. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
So as a matter of record, the Samsung spot has to be embedded here, too: Yes. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:44 pm
Taxes in Korea: Earned Income Tax Exclusion/FBAR Verdict in latest Samsung/Apple Courtroom Battle The Korean Corporate Restructuring Promotion Act of 2018: Korean Insolvency Law Updates The post Korea’s Woori Bank Lawsuit against Merrill/Bank of America Dismissed appeared first on The Korean Law Blog by IPG Legal. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:50 pm
In fact, Samsung's complaint was filed about a week before Apple's. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:35 pm
Patent trolls have gone after some pretty ridiculous things recently. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:44 am
In the case of RCD 0002 (which was the first dealt with in the judgement), Judge Birss accepted the defendant’s argument that the dashed lines indicated that the front panel was transparent (again highly reminiscent of Apple / Samsung). [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:22 pm
Now Samsung has to defend itself against an Ericsson complaint involving (besides ten other patents) one that wasn't really ripe for assertion under the standard Samsung advocates. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 4:00 pm
My current phone, the Samsung Note II, provides the first two. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:53 pm
The Dusseldorf court is aware of this and has recruited additional patent judges to accelerate the process.In the wireless-devices context the Dusseldorf Regional Court made worldwide headline news when it ordered a preliminary injunction against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the summer of 2011. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:40 pm
Apple won't get to leapfrog the three-judge panel in its renewed request for a permanent injunction against Samsung's products. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:03 am
Samsung appeal. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 9:08 am
Martha liked the Dodge “God Made a Farmer“ commercial, and the Audi “Prom” ad; Brent liked the Dodge “God Made a Farmer” commercial too; Catlan liked Go Daddy’s “Big Idea” commercial; Tiffany liked Bud Light’s “Very Superstitious” commercial with the voodoo dolls; Brad liked Doritos “Goat for Sale” commercial; Derek reluctantly admits to liking the Go Daddy make-out commercial; and Anjali liked… [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Seoul Central District Court recently held that Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Kun-hee should inherit control of Samsung against his siblings. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 4:06 am
Samsung asserted that: "1) the trial time limitation prejudiced Samsung; (2) allowing Apple to point out to the jury which Samsung witness were not called prejudiced Samsung; (3) Samsung's witnesses were barred from making some arguments, where Apple's witnesses were allowed to make other arguments; (4) Samsung was required to lay foundation for documents while Apple was not; (5) Samsung was forbidden to play advertisements while Apple… [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 1:58 am
No one is accusing companies like Apple, Microsoft or Samsung of anything comparable. [read post]
