Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 3921 - 3940 of 37,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2011, 12:49 pm by Michael O'Hear
This COA violates 28 U.S.C. 2253(c), as well as this Court’s decision in Slack v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
Although Lord Hope saw force in Mrs Patmalniece’s point that the persons about whom the Secretary of State had expressed concern were persons who were not nationals of the UK, he took the view that the justification itself, which is that only those who are economically or socially integrated with the host Member State should have access to its social assistance system, was blind to the person’s nationality. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:32 am by Brandon W. Barnett
  A UCMJ conviction is deemed to have taken place on United States soil and the defendant's subsequent conviction is properly enhanced under Penal Code §12.42(c)(2)(b)(v) for that conviction. [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:48 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
  He rightly concludes, I believe, that it is a constitutional right based upon the Supreme Court’s unanimous 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:24 am
 So, the Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ state law claims. [read post]