Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
In the absence of such prejudice, I believe that the trial court acted within its discretion, and, accordingly, I respectfully dissent.In Jeannine Porod v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:03 pm
Burke v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 4:45 am
The Appellate Division said that the trial court properly declined to annul that determination, citing Court of Appeals' decisions to the effect that a reviewing court may only disturb such finding if it determines that, as a matter of law,causation is established, that is, that the disability was the natural and proximate result of a line-of-duty accident. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 7:34 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Waiver Bars Review of Authority to Impose Non-USSG Sentence When 'Fast-Track' Departures Unavailable United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
, (IMPACT), (IPR-Helpdesk), (I/PUpdates), New OHIM guidelines on opposition, cancellation and international marks: (CATCH US IF YOU CAN!!!) [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 7:01 pm
The latest, added to the database last week, United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
In sum, Clifton's summary is: "I. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 12:09 pm
Contillo, sitting in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Bergen County, decided cross-motions for summary judgment filed by all parties in Joseph Garcia, M.D., et al v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
[Note that Hill v Haines recently went before the Court of Appeal, and we are awaiting the judgement.]Richard was accompanied by Simon Buckhaven, who gave a fascinating talk about the Charman case, detailing the facts and summarising the pertinent points. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
"But if they seek relief from the SEC, we are prepared to go to court to preserve the [AFSCME v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:12 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jose Alfredo Brena v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:25 am
Today's Hindu carries an op-ed by Vishnu V. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:28 pm
Even better would be to refuse to do any work until a signed, written agreement is in place [wishful thinking, I know].I think this one deserves review by the Court of Appeals. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
§ 1404(a) cannot provide a basis for the transfer order in this case because the Court of Federal Claims is not a "district or division" under § 1404(a); 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:47 pm
Yesterday, the New York Court of Appeals-- the state's highest court-- issued two decisions in the long-running, high-stakes dispute between two factions of New York's Orthodox-Jewish Satmar Hasidic community. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:45 pm
It is United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in an opinion worthy of publication, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five) held that the trial court had improperly sustained without leave to amend the defendant's demurrer to the plaintiffs' UCL and CLRA claims. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
Co., the New York Court of Appeals in Raffellini v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 6:54 pm
The Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion in Omerod v. [read post]
