Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
And in reliance of its determination, the court principally cited to the case of Kirsh v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The Court returned to the issue in Burns v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
But the court's first two points are sound. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
When the first of the complaints were filed, the drug manufacturer defendant removed the cases to federal court, which resulted in the plaintiffs’ counsel representing to the district court that the cases, if remanded, would be assigned to a single state judge “for all purposes. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:35 am
Surprisingly, the appellate court did not cite the Supreme Court’s decision in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
ShareWednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Whilst a challenge to a decision on the first of those issues may have to be brought by way of judicial review, the second is within s.202(1)(f) even though it involves an exercise of the s.208(2) power. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
” At Slate, Nicholas Stephanopoulos, argues that “[j]ust by changing how district lines are drawn—without persuading a single voter—gerrymandering warps the entire political system,” and that without “judicial intervention …, in gerrymandered states, the government will persistently flout the public will. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
In re Metoprolol Succinate Patent Litigation, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 06-1254. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
He had a healthy dose of it when he was first on the court. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am
Hyatt, in which the court overruled a 40-year-old precedent, Nevada v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:54 pm
United States and Overton v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed a district court injunction requiring bond hearings every six months for immigrant detainees. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
The district court denied Mitze's motion. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
First, it recognizes the power of the government to take private property for public use. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
(3) Whether “cause” exists for failing to present an ineffective assistance claim in state court, where such a claim may first be raised in postconviction proceedings, and state-appointed postconviction counsel failed to raise a claim implicating actual innocence? [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:28 am
This judicial exception to eligibility is an unnecessary and confusing creation of the courts. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:13 am
The court first examined whether the arbitration agreement was unenforceable because it was unconscionable. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
The first and most important of those decisions is Ja’Chim Scheuing v. [read post]
