Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 3921 - 3940 of 57,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Herald-Sun published: “Supt Gerin said he was concerned the club had contacted some of the witnesses after receiving the police submission”, but did not explicitly state that this was improper, inappropriate or unlawful. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:22 pm by WIMS
The United States then appealed the liability determination and damages award. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:32 am
Disclosure of a public agency’s "policies, procedures, rules and regulations”Sabilia v State of New York, 14 Misc.3d 1228(A) Peter Sabilia and his wife, Stephanie, sued the State of New York after Peter was injured as a result of his being run over by a State motor vehicle sunbathing on the beach at Jones Beach State Park. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  It is almost as if the Second Circuit was asking for it. 4)  That said, the argument that some conservatives are now making on standing, i.e. that Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Whether Gentry remains good law or not may be gleaned from this opinion but it doesn’t appear likely it will be clearly stated. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
Petitioner went through three sets of counsel, when the state court court said "enough" and refused a fourth set. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:59 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 The Court of Appeals, in People v Clermont (2013 NY Slip Op 06806 [10/22/13]) the defense suppression motion said defendant had been stopped due to an MVA when no car was involved. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:20 pm
Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Kelly issued a press release yesterday, praising the United States Supreme Court for its decision in Caperton v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
JOSEFFER (ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING THE PETITIONER): The United States view — I’m not sure exactly how much we disagree on this — but the United States view is that, for example, a blank disk is not a component of this invention because you don’t need a blank disk to practice this invention. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am by INFORRM
But a claimant in a defamation or malicious falsehood claim who obtained permission to serve out of the jurisdiction had to limit the claim to alleged publications within England and Wales – a principle re-stated by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Forbes Inc (No.1) ([2000] 1 WLR 1004) Mr Huda’s only potentially viable cause of action was the publication of the report to the GOC -he had no real prospect of establishing publication to anyone… [read post]