Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:51 pm
” Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, there is no longer any protection from private litigation for ratings agency misstatements. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
by Paul Alan Levy We have previously blogged about the crucial role played by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in protecting the ability of consumers to speak effectively about corporate or political wrongdoing, by protecting the hosts of web sites and email services from being sued over the contents of communications that are made using their services. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Dodd-Frank re-writes federal banking law and creates a new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
Not stopping there, the court went on to hold that: (1) “because the consumer can not and does not decide what product to purchase” when a prescription is required, and (2) “the high degree of federal regulation,” by the FDA, prescription medical products are not subject to consumer protection claims at all. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:33 am
PSK, LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
It isn’t a law that would be made up out of whole cloth. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:50 am
(Compare Greenwood v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
IT DOESN’T SAY THAT. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:23 pm
A consumer choice standard doesn’t move the ball forward on any of those margins. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
(See Garland-Sash v. [read post]
Court Rejects Plaintiff's Proposal of Class Notice via Twitter, SMS, and Email -- Jermyn v. Best Buy
22 Dec 2010, 1:53 pm
[Post by Venkat] Jermyn v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
Washington can’t – and shouldn’t – dictate a policy agenda for Indian Country. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:53 am
White v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:34 am
What a shame that Case T-19/07 Systran SA v The European Commission is available only in French. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Rather, “[t]he case must be in such a posture that the facts already in the possession of the police would have led to [the] evidence notwithstanding the police misconduct. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:11 am
To sum up, Pearlstein delivers this gem: But it is worth remembering that ag [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm
Isn't the fair dealing reforms really about saving money for education? [read post]
