Search for: "The Supreme Court of New Mexico" Results 3921 - 3940 of 4,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2007, 3:48 pm
Seeks Alleged Drug Leader in Mexico, Associated Press Newswire, November 30, 2007, available at LEXIS, News Library, Wire News Services. [2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] Id.[6] Id.[7] Id.[8] Id.[9] Id.[10] Id.[11] Treaty of Extradition between the United States of America and the United Mexican States (Mexico), U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 2:27 am
Supreme Courtreauthorized the death penalty in 1976. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 8:07 am
Legislatures in other states, including New Mexico, Montana and Nebraska, came close to abolishing it this year. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 9:10 pm
Earlier this month, however, the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled the other way, poking a big hole in the "firefighters' rule" which traditionally barred recovery by rescuers against those who cause accidents. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 2:34 am
Supreme Court reauthorized the death penalty in 1976. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 11:32 pm
Executions have been on hold across the US while the supreme court considers the issue. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 8:17 am
Executions have been on hold across the US while the supreme court considers the issue. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:49 am
Supreme Court in recent years has banned executions of the mentally retarded and juveniles. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 5:59 am
Supreme Court reauthorized the death penalty in 1976. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:48 am
"The New Jersey Senate voted Monday to make the state the first in the country to repeal the death penalty since 1976, when the United States Supreme Court set guidelines for the nation's current system of capital punishment. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 8:39 am
Supreme Court reinstated the ultimate punishment three decades ago, reports the Philadelphia Inquirer. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:59 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court formally reprimanded a judge who had endorsed the candidacy of the incumbent mayor of Farmington New Mexico. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 3:17 am
That's the issue the New Mexico Supreme Court addressed in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:33 pm
The federal depository libraries participating in the pilot are: Alaska State Court Law Library, AK 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Library, IL San Bernadino County Law Library, CA University of Michigan School of Law, MI Sacramento County Public Law Library, CA University of Tennessee College of Law, TN Nova Southeastern University Law Library, FL New Mexico Supreme Court Law Library, NM Lee College, TX Rutgers Law Library, NJ State… [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 5:24 am
However, the LST debate did give me the opportunity to get off this line in the comments:When Rhetoric meets Reality in the politics of crime and punishment, the Tax Increase typically results as their fat, obnoxious bastard child, with Public Safety - thin, waifish, and orphaned - left to its own devices, scrounging for crumbs.82 Years of Drug War Deja Vu and CountingAs President Bush proposes a $1.5 billion aid plan to Mexico to train its police and military, an astute DRC Net reader… [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:13 pm
I met Peter Lattman and Sarah Waldeck at the close of the service, and the two of them struck up a conversation regarding the Oregon Supreme Court considering the legal issues of circumcision for a 12-year-old boy.Ambling through Fort Wadsworth, which protected New York for almost 200 years, it was hard not to think of soldiers and war as we waited, especially given Veterans Day. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 7:41 pm
In my own New Mexico, a liberal legislature in 1975 removed "absence of consent" from the rape statute, so that any sexual penetration accomplished by force or coercion was criminal. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:00 am
Secretary of New Mexico Dept. of Corrections, 50 F.3d 801, 825 n. 36 (10th Cir.1995) ("In the absence of actual knowledge ... the circuits are somewhat split as to the precise contours of when knowledge by an arm of the State will be imputed to the prosecution. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 10:47 pm
In an 1885 rape case, the Indiana Supreme Court approved this instruction as a correct statement of the law:Evidence has been introduced as to the moral character of the prosecuting witness, and as to her reputation for chastity and virtue. [read post]