Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 9,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
Bethune-Hill, an appeal by Republican legislators of a lower-court ruling that requires 11 state legislative districts to be redrawn to correct racial gerrymandering, and Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:05 am
Smith (Cabarrus)(Tennille): derivative action to enjoin sale of corporate assets and for appointment of a receiver. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:49 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
” That analysis, Thapar continued, could have resolved several contentious Supreme Court cases, like Smith v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
” That analysis, Thapar continued, could have resolved several contentious Supreme Court cases, like Smith v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 4:10 am
See, e.g., Cold War Museum, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Radtke, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Radtke, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:13 am
” (Smith v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:39 am
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:27 am
Zaratzian v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
”[v] The American Revolution and US Constitution are less a founding of this history of civic identity than a continuation of it, and even the Civil War itself is only a temporary cessation of this history’s constancy. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:47 pm
The case is Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 7:07 am
Lawson v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility is primarily a matter to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses, and its determination should be accorded great deference on appeal (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 644-645 [2006]; People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]). [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
In the August 23, 2023 opinion in Moore v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
Also writing for this blog, Gregory Massing analyzes the Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
