Search for: "United States v. New York" Results 3921 - 3940 of 16,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:04 am
" Citing to New York state court decisions, the court observed that the duty to give notice arises when, from the information available relative to the accident, an insured could glean a reasonable possibility of the policy's involvement. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 6:15 am by Adrienne Kendrick
Edgardo Ramos of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.... [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:51 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), in State of New York, et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:10 am
According to the opinion for the panel by Justice Kane, Spicehandler was actually engaged in his employment by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company when he, then a pedestrian, was struck by a motorist on the street in New York City, a few years after he and Langan had been united as civil partners in Vermont. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am by Charles Kotuby
Judge Lynch in the Southern District of New York noted nearly a decade-ago that this "question may become increasingly academic, as more and more states adopt the federal rule on forum-selection clauses. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Dismissal to Bulk of Charges in Action Alleging Bribery in Iraq Oil-for-Food Program United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Dismissal to Bulk of Charges in Action Alleging Bribery in Iraq Oil-for-Food Program United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
'" It said "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use which the petitioners urge us to apply was abandoned long before the United States Supreme Court concluded [in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005])] that the use of eminent domain to carry out an economic development plan does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. [read post]