Search for: "Wells v. Heard*" Results 3921 - 3940 of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 7:37 am by S
Which is all very well if they are a local authority or housing association that meets the criteria in Weaver but what if they are a private landlord or housing association that does not meet the criteria in Weaver? [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  That case, State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:42 pm by David Klein
The FTSA allows recovery of $500-1500, per violation, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:10 am by Claire Phipps-Jones (Bristows)
Some differences in approach between the various Local Divisions remain, and may well harmonise over time as the Court of Appeal opines on further aspects of PI cases. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 11:49 am by SJM
In other words, Mrs B’s mother did nothing which no well-advised person would have done.Public Law ChallengeThis ground was also dismissed. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:54 am by Gritsforbreakfast
My own views on the degradation of the Fourth Amendment were well stated by Jamie Spencer over at the new Affirmative Links group criminal defense blog, so I'll refer readers to his essay rather than replicate his fine efforts.ASIDE: FWIW, this is officially the 5,000th post on Grits for Breakfast since the blog was launched in October 2004. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:05 am by Steve Harms
Bridge v Ocwen was just heard in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Ohio, so has national implications as a federal case. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:06 pm by Wells Bennett
The government has filed its opposition brief in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:21 am by James Campise
In Deiulemar Compagnia di Navigazione SpA v M/V Allegra, the court allowed depositions, as well as access to documentary and physical evidence in such a circumstance. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am by Ric Blumhardt
  Since the announcement, Cantil-Sakauye has gained the public support of Chief Justice Ronald George as well as Third District Presiding Justice, Arthur Scotland. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 10:33 am by Ric Blumhardt
  Since the announcement, Cantil-Sakauye has gained the public support of Chief Justice Ronald George as well as Third District Presiding Justice, Arthur Scotland. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
Williams), as well as pending petitions over the District of Columbia's handgun ban (District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am by Margo Schlanger
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Lomax v. [read post]