Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 3941 - 3960 of 95,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 7:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
After all, there were drugs all over the place to start with.The Court of Appeals (Sack, Wesley and Carney) agrees that the officers acted reasonable under the circumstances in detaining the plaintiffs. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:42 am
The plaintiff claims that the trial court erroneously dismissed all of the plaintiff’s claims, except those against this court and the New London Superior Court, which the plaintiff has not pursued on appeal. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
  It explained that the plaintiffs did not meet their evidentiary burden of establishing commonality because they neither identified a “common and unlawful mode” by which defendants’ loan officers exercised their discretion, nor demonstrated that such common discriminatory mode “affected all class members in all regions and bank branches in a common way. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:10 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
 By way of background, this matter involves a motor vehicle accident in which all Plaintiffs were passengers in a bus that was involved in a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Finally, the complaint alleged that Sereca "had the ability to pay all wages" earned by the class members, contradicting the allegation that the contracts violated section 2810. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
  It explained that the plaintiffs did not meet their evidentiary burden of establishing commonality because they neither identified a “common and unlawful mode” by which defendants’ loan officers exercised their discretion, nor demonstrated that such common discriminatory mode “affected all class members in all regions and bank branches in a common way. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:26 am by Docket Navigator
Because the Court finds that [defendant's] actions regarding the issue of obviousness on Claims 8 and 19 were not made in good faith, but as an attempt to extend the time of the ITC preclusion order on these two claims directed against [plaintiff], the Court finds this portion of the case to be sufficiently exceptional to warrant awarding [plaintiff] one half of the attorneys' fees incurred during the week of the trial (to reflect [plaintiff's] attorney time… [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The court noted in Gumby also rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion that liability could be established under an argument that the Defendant’s policy that all employees have a general responsibility to inspect the floors amounted to no policy at all. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" … The plaintiff says that on July 2, 2016, after a visit with a friend, he went to the strip search area to be strip searched under a policy that requires all prisoners to submit to a strip-search after a contact visit. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:22 am
Plaintiffs must serve a complaint on all defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:53 am
  The court agreed with the panel on all four of the grounds we discussed before, although nos. 2 and 3 were more or less combined. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 3:41 pm
All of the aforementioned affirmations and the medical reports accompanying same indicate that plaintiff had indeed incurred a serious injury. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:05 pm
The counsel for the defendant argues that the plaintiff had assumed all the risks of the skating and field trip. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:06 am by K&L Gates
  In the course of discovery, the defendant requested production of all documents, including ESI, related to the allegations contained in the complaint. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
A Delaware Court again recently denied transfer from Delaware to the Northern District of California despite that (a) all of the accused infringers were headquartered in the transferee venue, (b) the party witnesses knowledgeable about the accused products and documents related to the accused products were there and (c) the plaintiff also maintained an office there as well. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 8:31 am by Dave Abels
In so doing, the jury must consider all the evidence presented and come to a reasoned conclusion based on that evidence. [read post]