Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 3941 - 3960 of 11,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm by Matthew D. Lee
Shortly thereafter, the SEC announced that it had obtained a cease-and-desist order to halt a California company’s ICO (coverage here). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Newmark Realty provides mortgage services in the field of commercial real estate, at first in California and now with offices in seven states, with 65 people working for it and “originating and servicing loans for properties” located all over the country. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Friday, the Arizona State Bar filed a disciplinary complaint accusing two lawyers of filing libel lawsuits against fake defendants. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 5:57 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Supreme Court recently issued an epic opinion, ending the lengthy saga of litigation involving efforts by some stockholders of Wal-Mart to pursue claims in connection with alleged improprieties involving the Mexican subsidiary of Wal-Mart, in California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:00 am by Frank Knizner
Alcohol beverage trademarks are also commonly refused in light of similar prior registrations for restaurants and bars, or even glassware. [read post]
Minnesota, a 1931 case in which the Court held it was unconstitutional for a state law to authorize and a state court to enjoin the publication of “a malicious, scandalous and defamatory newspaper, magazine or other publication” determined to be a nuisance. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 12:53 pm by Amy Howe
Melin (March 19): Whether a state law providing that the designation of a spouse as a beneficiary (for example, of a life insurance policy) is automatically revoked if the couple divorces violates the Constitution’s contracts clause – which bars states from enacting laws that impair contracts – when the state law is applied to a contract that was signed before the law was enacted. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:22 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
 In its lawsuit, Oracle brought a lawsuit alleging a kitchen sink of claims, including copyright infringement, as well as state law claims including breach of contract, unfair competition, trespass, and violations of the California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act (CDAFA) and the Nevada Computer Crimes Law (NCCL) (the “Oracle Suit”). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:45 am
State Laws That Prohibit NDAs in Certain Sexual Misconduct Cases Survivors in California may also be able to challenge an NDA under a California law that bars settlement agreements that contain nondisclosure provisions related to felony sex offenses. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
However, it seems fair to say that state courts – particularly California state courts – have seen a booming business in Section 11 lawsuits in recent years. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
In effect, it reversed a decision of the California Supreme Court and directed the dismissal of 592 non-California claims from 33 other states. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 8:30 am by azatty
In a landmark decision, six of President Roosevelt’s eight appointees to the United States Supreme Court upheld Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
California (332 U.S. 46, 1947), observing “Bingham may, without extravagance, be called the Madison of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.htmlStand Up For California! [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.htmlStand Up For California! [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
Taxpayers generally have the right to take their cases to court. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:26 am by Arthur F. Coon
In affirming the trial court’s judgment on exhaustion grounds, and alternatively on the merits, the Court of Appeal’s opinion stated a number of significant holdings and observations, including the following: The exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine bars judicial redress where a plaintiff fails to invoke or exhaust an available administrative remedy; exhaustion is a “jurisdictional prerequisite in the sense that it is not a matter of… [read post]