Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 34,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Citing Morillion v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:58 am
Alternatively, a California appellate court, in Faulkinbury v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:45 pm
The case is Jankey v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
Peviani v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:29 pm
Furthermore, as noted by the California Supreme Court in Brinker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 10:47 pm
In Narayan v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:09 am
Jim (Gaming Revenue Distributions; Taxation)California v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:34 pm
In a recent case, Cohen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
Serova v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:02 am
The opinion in Vu v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
§ 14501 et seq.) does not preempt this action under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:12 am
Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC, 93 F.4th 459 (9th Cir. 2024) vacated a district court’s dismissal of a former employee’s nonindividual PAGA claims and remanded the nonindividual claims to allow the district court to apply California law as interpreted in Adolph v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:00 am
The landmark California Supreme Court case on the issue of existence of implied employment contract is Foley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
Smith is a clinical lecturer in law at Yale Law School. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:36 am
Yelp successfully defended using California’s anti-SLAPP law. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 6:25 am
Additional Resources: Sensoria, LLC et al v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm
Today, in Coito v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
” The court harkened back to the California case Edwards v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:35 am
That decision was Gerard v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
The depublication request, filed by the California Employment Law Council, argued that Court of Appeal did not follow the Supreme Court's directives when it applied the administrative exemption on remand. [read post]