Search for: "Davis v. State"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 6,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
If there is a silver lining in the ruling of Judge Davis, it is that he resisted the call of the plaintiffs to extend the holding of Bush v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:35 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
Back in 1994, in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Bd. of Educ., 777 F.2d 1403, 1410 (10th Cir. 1985); Davis v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
Wendy Davis' coverage. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
V. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
" Wendy Davis' writeup [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:28 am
In State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
"The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a defendant the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him [or her]' " (People v Brown, 13 NY3d 332, 338). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 4:10 am
In Ohio, Mark Davis was sanctioned by a public reprimand for "falsely stating his academic credentials," and, outrageously, defiantly arguing his cause rather than cowering on the floor in remorse. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm
The Court ordered the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application for leave to appeal or take other action in Davis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:49 am
Davis, 766 F.2d 865 (4th Cir. 1985), the holding in Davis may have been overruled by the Supreme Court's subsequent decisions in Buckley and Meyer v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm
Perhaps most relevant is this in-chambers opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Lux v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.” This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
Case Law: Raab MP v Associated – confidentiality agreements and libel proceedings – Gervase de Wilde
23 Dec 2011, 12:57 am
Her solicitor stated that a witness statement which had been served on the Claimant should not be disclosed to the Defendant, as it was covered by the Agreement. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
United States v. [read post]
