Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 3941 - 3960 of 25,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
As between States of the United States, the giving of such res judicata effect is required by full faith and credit.It’s interesting to watch European solutions to problems of federalism converge, at least in this instance, on US solutions! [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:02 am by James J. La Rocca
By way of brief background, the Constitution generally requires the Senate to approve the President’s appointments of United States officers, including members of the NLRB. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:21 pm by Amy Howe
The oral argument in Janus will be followed the next day by oral argument in a major digital privacy case, United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:25 pm by Walter James
In January 2007, Cody Tuma went to the day shift and Todd Cage became night manager. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 12:47 pm by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Unfortunately, rear-end accidents take place every day in Florida and throughout the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Rubio, it would “empower state and local governments in the United States to counter the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement’s discriminatory economic warfare against the Jewish state. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am by Victoria VanBuren
  They contend that Congress gave the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and National Governing Bodies (NGB)—like USA Cycling—exclusive jurisdiction over eligibility for competitions. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:14 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  A recent case before the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals explained that these time extensions will not be extended if the delay in receipt was caused by the plaintiff. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:22 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court of Rhode Island, Providence. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 11:20 am by Orin Kerr
Over at Lawfare, I have a long post criticizing the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]