Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 3941 - 3960 of 40,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2017, 11:25 am by Liisa Speaker
If the judge who entered the judgment or order is absent or unable to act, an order vacating or setting aside the judgment or order or staying proceedings under the judgment or order may be entered by a judge otherwise empowered to rule in the matter.Morrissette v Doe, (DocketNo. 331941), (a no-fault case) is an interlocutory appeal concerning a procedural issue, namely, a reversal by one judge of the orders of another under MCR 2.613(B)… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:38 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The original notice of proposed rulemaking published here on September 23, 2019 would exempt ”every student performing teaching, research and any services for compensation, at a private college or university in connection with his or her studies from treatment as an “employee” for purposes of Section 2(3) of the NLRA. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This case does not fit within the parameters of any of the exceptions set forth in CPL 40.20(2). [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:02 pm by Simon Gibbs
Does that mean that a powerful weapon has been lost to defendants and that sloppy claimant solicitors can rest easy? [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The lawsuit was filed on March 2 against USDA by the Center for Food Safety and several prominent organic growers. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm by Steven Cohen
  The defendant has filed a motion to exclude this expert from testifying. [read post]
The District Court noted that “principal injury” is satisfied when either: (1) the principal injuries resulting from the alleged conduct of each defendant were incurred in the state in which the action was originally filed; or (2) the principal injuries resulting from any related conduct of each defendant were incurred in that state. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Seven exceptions, set forth in CPL 40.20(2), "qualify the general proscription. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 3:37 pm by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
In Massachusetts, impoundment of a car on a public way is justified by four purposes: (1) protection of the owner’s property from vandalism or theft while the vehicle remains in police custody; (2) where a vehicle, if left unattended, poses a public safety risk; (3) if the car stopped does not have valid registration plates; and (4) to protect the police and public from potentially dangerous items that might be in the vehicle. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 3:37 pm by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
In Massachusetts, impoundment of a car on a public way is justified by four purposes: (1) protection of the owner’s property from vandalism or theft while the vehicle remains in police custody; (2) where a vehicle, if left unattended, poses a public safety risk; (3) if the car stopped does not have valid registration plates; and (4) to protect the police and public from potentially dangerous items that might be in the vehicle. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 3:37 pm by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
In Massachusetts, impoundment of a car on a public way is justified by four purposes: (1) protection of the owner’s property from vandalism or theft while the vehicle remains in police custody; (2) where a vehicle, if left unattended, poses a public safety risk; (3) if the car stopped does not have valid registration plates; and (4) to protect the police and public from potentially dangerous items that might be in the vehicle. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Massie, 2 N.Y.3d 179, 184 (N.Y. 2004).In 2012 the Court of Appeals considered whether evidence that violated a defendant’s right of confrontation could be admitted at trial if the defense opened the door, concluding that it could. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 7:07 am by Brian Cordery
On this basis, this squeeze by the Defendants was unsuccessful and he held the claims to be entitled to priority. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:05 pm
The guidelines for assessing point in this category allow 20 points if the sex crime was directed towards someone the defendant does not know. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The report does not set forth the basis for these conclusions which are inconsistent with the statements of the defendant. [read post]