Search for: "Deter v. Deter" Results 3941 - 3960 of 5,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2018, 5:55 am by Andrew Appel
  E2E-V methods were developed by several computer scientists over the past 35 years or so. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am by INFORRM
Once the issue is seen to involve both Article 10 and Article 8, the applicant’s pleadings based on Armoniene v Lithuania (2009) 48 EHRR 53 and I v Finland (2009) 48 EHRR 31 become a misapplication of those cases. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
From a June 23 decision by Judge Joel Hillman (D.N.J.) in Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Is the desire to expose a cheating ex-boyfriend to social ostracism a good motive (on the theory that it will deter other such behavior in one’s social circle) or a bad motive (on the theory that it is simply the desire to harm)? [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 5:25 am by Peter Mahler
Demarest cited it as precedent for her ruling in Novikov v Oceana Holdings Corp., 2014 NY Slip Op 24332 [Sup Ct, Kings County Nov. 3, 2014], granting a close corporation minority shareholder’s petition to inspect an array of financial and corporate records to investigate possible wrongdoing by the controlling shareholders. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 3:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court entered its opinion in California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:34 am by Cristina Mariottini
Carlos Santaló Goris, Researcher at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Luxembourg, offers a summary and an analysis of the CJEU Case C-555/18, K.H.K. v. [read post]