Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 12,793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2016, 5:05 am
While laudable, this entry point clouds an assessment of where the legal system is moving because it neglects the fundamental role of the political power organizing it: the CCP.The legal system does not operate in a vacuum. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Importantly Access Copyright does not itself hold any of the copyrights that it manages. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
Businesses should evaluate their FLSA exposures from both workers they recognize as common law employees and those performing services in capacities that the business typically does not view as common law or otherwise covered by the FLSA when managing FLSA compliance and evaluating exposures, employers should exercise care not to overlook potential responsibilities and exposures associated with outsourced services provided through relationships characterized by the employer as… [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
See 29 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
The Court does not consider that the very essence of the applicant's right to a fair trial was impaired. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
The Court does not consider that the very essence of the applicant's right to a fair trial was impaired. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
The Court does not consider that the very essence of the applicant's right to a fair trial was impaired. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
Tex. 3/29/06). [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
Tex. 3/29/06). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:06 am
It does not compel any agreement whatever. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:46 pm
The Court also addressed Sgro’s claim under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:53 am
The January 29 post linked to an earlier post, which was critical of a report in the Sacramento Bee. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:53 am
The FLSA does not define the term “independent contractor. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 4:07 am
Alvarez, 546 U.S. 21, 29 (2004) (quoting 29 C.F.R. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 2:54 pm
These federal requirements are again spelled out in in UIPL 2-16 (1 Oct. 2015) and UIPL 2-16 Change 1 (11 May 2020). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
To avoid any misunderstanding, let me make it clear that the court is not unsympathetic to the tragic plight described by Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, and Jane Doe No. 3. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:40 am
But like the House bill, the final legislation does not apply to employers of 500 or more. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:34 am
getdoc+uscview+t09t12+3761+0++%28%29%20%20AND%20%28%2811%29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20AND%20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%28101%29%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 . [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 8:53 am
” But that does not justify the arbitrator’s reasoning. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:41 am
§ 2560.503-1(i)(4). [read post]
