Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 5,277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
Waiver of Immunity By entering into a contract, a governmental entity waives its immunity from liability for breach of the contract, "but does not, merely by entering into a contract, waive immunity from suit. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:10 am
Historically, the USPTO treated intentional misrepresentations, false and misleading statements under 37 CFR § 11.18(b)(1) as exemplified by MPEP § 410. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
…and don’t forget our recent posts: Religious freedom does not stop at the prison gates – Part 2 July 21, 2011 Rosalind English The book that all family practitioners wish they had written July 21, 2011 1 Crown Office Row Ratcliffe climate change protesters acquitted on appeal July 20, 2011 David Hart QC Terrorism off the agenda, for now July 20, 2011 Adam Wagner A leap of faith? [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:06 pm
The newly proposed Rule 56(b) (37 C.F.R. 1.56(b)) would read as follows: Sec. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
Because sellers never have access to individuals’ actual reservation prices, first-degree price discrimination does not exist in the real world. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Part 1 airs on BlogTalkRadio at 8:30 AM on Friday, July 22; part 2 at 8:30 AM on Friday, July 29. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
While the items do not apply per se, as Rule 15-1(15)’s omnibus cap does instead, Mr. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:25 am
Certain events such as medical attention and legislatively required rest breaks can pause this, but police bail does not. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
But the diligence period does not start at conception. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm
” Citing his 37 years in the Marines, and what he has learned while implementing the repeal law, Gen. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
To avoid either deficient or excessive rates of N application, the price ratio range recommendations for corn is confined between 4:1 and 10:1. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
We won’t give odds on the Court’s accepting the appea, as another long snooze may be in the offing, but if it does, our money would be on reversal.That’s what we think of Brown. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:19 pm
(The BEYAZ approval letter does not include a time stamp.) [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:09 am
Remember, your choice does matter. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
In Bryan v UK the European Court stated: 37. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
See Footnote 1 We conclude the first issue is dispositive of this appeal. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
" Hmm, does this sound familiar, as in the Casey Anthony case? [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
It does not contain the expression “and from no others”. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:28 am
The settlement stipulation does not indicate whether or to what extent any of the other defendants are contributing toward the settlement amount. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
The activity range required by claim 1 is therefore unclear, which implies that claim 1 of the main request does not meet the requirements of A 84.[2.6] The [patent proprietor] argued that claim 1 met the requirements of A 84 as a measurement method was given in […] the opposed patent. [read post]
