Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 11,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
Ins. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patentThe on-going saga between Eli Lilly and Actavis regarding Lilly's pemetrexed disodium product has kept the English courts busy for years. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
And, over at Balkinization, Georgetown Law’s John Mikhail presents the abstract for his SSRN paper, The Definition of "Emolument" in English Language and Legal Dictionaries, 1523-1806, together with some tables and figures summarizing its main findings showing “why the Trump Justice Department’s narrow definition of ‘emolument’ in CREW v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
From Hart Publishing:It is now well established that the law of unjust enrichment forms an important and distinctive part of the English law of obligations. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Comment The decision of the majority sits uneasily with the position as it would be for other English citizens ordinarily resident in Northern Ireland, who seek treatment through the NHS for other illnesses. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:10 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal stated in Sietzema v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
She had the chance to explain any inconsistencies and Malik gave his evidence to the FtT in English. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
" That led the court to a consideration of prior English case law as well of that of other EPC member states. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
" That led the court to a consideration of prior English case law as well of that of other EPC member states. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:23 am
**The decision is available in English only, as delay of its issuance would be prejudicial to the public interest. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
Trump cannot withstand scrutiny.In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Canada (Prime Minister) v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm
The fact that your client did not understand the English legal system in relation to being homeless is ignorance of the legal consequences and not ignorance of a relevant fact. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:51 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:51 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 5:07 am
V. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
But in Middle English, the word “deer” meant a beast or animal of any kind. [read post]
