Search for: "Ex Parte Clear" Results 3941 - 3960 of 5,119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2011, 6:29 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
So I agree with this section's overall conclusion, but it is not clear that the inventor stories from Part I can teach us anything about disclosure.Part III contains the most novel aspect of Lemley's argument: not only might races have some benefits (which has been suggested by others like John Duffy, Michael Abramowicz, and Suzanne Scotchmer), but racing might be the dominant normative justification for the patent system. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:22 am by Bexis
 Further, it is clear and undisputed that Plaintiffs’ counsel themselves have participated in ex parte communications with these witnesses. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:41 pm
The statute makes it clear that these types of orders for additional child support should reference 4063 (See FC § 4063(a)(1), (2)). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:41 pm
The statute makes it clear that these types of orders for additional child support should reference 4063 (See FC § 4063(a)(1), (2)). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:37 pm by Elie Mystal
Your advice would be appreciated.To be clear, I did not force my student loans into default as part of some self-directed plan. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:08 pm by Eric
* A professor was awarded tenure based in part on his Wikipedia contributions [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:58 am by Stefanie Levine
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/011,717 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:58 am by Stefanie Levine
The following ex parte requests were filed: (1) 90/011,717 (electronically filed) - U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
(assuming the examiners would even remember anything from 50 or so  interviews ago) MPEP 1701.01 is instructive in this regard: A request by a third party to take deposition testimony of a patent examiner in a pending ex parte reexamination proceeding will generally be denied in view of the ex parte nature of the reexamination proceeding. . . [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The same applies to the interpretation of the Implementing Regulations on the Grant of European Patents and the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal, as they are part of the EPC (A 164(1)) or have their basis in the Implementing Regulations (R 12(3)). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 7:56 am by James Hamilton
If one of those factors were responsible for the loss or part of it, a plaintiff would not be able to prove loss causation to that extent. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:49 am by Jonathan Spadt
Today we have litigation, ex-parte reexamination and inter-partes reexamination. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
  Judge Tozzi asked how to reconcile Kahanamoku and Ex Parte Milligan with the Ali case, to which Kazin noted that neither of those appellants served with the land or naval forces, plus they were subjected to military commissions versus a court-martial.Kazin’s argument necessarily relied heavily on individual trial judges’ findings of fact in divining such issues as when does Article 2 jurisdiction over contractors end. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am by Lovechilde
Instead it is utterly clear that there was no intention to arrest him, and that this was every bit an assassination, in defiance of Pakistani law (even if there was covert connivance by that country’s authorities) and of international law. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:41 am by kenliu
Ken Liu is a speculative fiction author whose stories have been published in The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, Strange Horizons, Clarkesworld, and Lightspeed, among other places. [read post]