Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE" Results 3941 - 3960 of 5,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2025, 2:25 pm by Mark Bennett
That’s Interesting Legal Issue #3: There’s a United States Supreme Court case called U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 7:55 pm by John Elwood
Judge Harris Hartz dissented, citing Supreme Court precedent recognizing that “speech is not unprotected merely because it is uttered by professionals. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm by Melissa Hart
California Teachers Association and revisits the question of the constitutionality of public-sector union agency fees, which it considered just a few years ago in Harris v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am by James Bickford
United States and Barber v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even as a judge on the Eighth Circuit, Harry Blackmun was substantially more liberal than President Nixon realized, but it was not until after he wrote the majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARECONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUPlaintiff,v.THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTER STUDENT LOAN TRUST, et al.Defendants.C.A. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARECONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUPlaintiff,v.THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTER STUDENT LOAN TRUST, et al.Defendants.C.A. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The Biden-Harris Administration’s release of the United States’ second National Action Plan (NAP) on Responsible Business Conduct reflects a whole-of-government commitment to strengthen RBC. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]