Search for: "Human v. State" Results 3941 - 3960 of 19,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2008, 8:01 am
and Hull McGuire love humans and therefore love all jurors (except for The-Morally-Certain and, of course, some Duke grads and most engineers). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
The applicants appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (the Court), arguing that the court order against them amounted to a breach of Article 10. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
On February 3, 2012, the International Court of Justice in The Hague delivered its judgment in the case on Jurisdictional Immunities of the State, Germany v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:39 am by Suzanne Ito
Wednesday, May 16 National Security/Torture/Detention: On May 16, ACLU Human Rights Program Director Jamil Dakwar will attend and live-tweet from a European Court of Human Rights hearing in El-Masri v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:51 pm by Andrew Hamm
The secretary and the state ask the court to review that decision in Azar v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
v=IIGyVa5Xftw#t=49 At the heart of the takedown decision is a fight over fair use in copyrights when mixed with commercial speech. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:02 pm by Harry Styron
A recent opinion of the Missouri court of appeals, M’Shoogy Animal Rescue v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
But it is hoped that this compromise between authors, publishers, libraries, and a company willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to digitize so much of the printed history of humanity will be another small step toward the vision that the Alexandrian Library represents. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 7:35 am by CMS
It also stated that there is no valid chain of title from DABUS to the Appellant. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am by Jonathan Metzer
Image: Flickr.com   R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42 In a nutshell The Government’s flagship scheme to deport foreign criminals first and hear their appeals later was ruled by the Supreme Court to be incompatible with the appellants’ right to respect for their private and family life (reversing the decision below). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:21 pm by Elizabeth R. Kirk and Dr. Ingrid Skop
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]