Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 7,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2020, 6:21 am
With command of the air, a country could achieve decisive victory quickly and at limited cost. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am
You made a contract to give the whole dispute to the imams, so we're going to rubber-stamp whatever decision they make, even ones that reverse prior decisions by the trial court, unless you can show us a really good reason why we shouldn't, and you haven't done that yet. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:58 am
Officials could no longer justify the cost of an appeal against Mr Thomas's public interest ruling that details could be revealed about a 10-year-old policy. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Earlier that day, candidate Trump made public statements that included the following: ‘Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:20 am
That’s the world I believe we’re living in. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:06 am
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE AND JERRY PATTERSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS TEXAS LAND COMMISSIONER, No. 12-0483 Granted for argument on June 7, 2013 This is another case about whether the Texas General Land Office has taken land along a beachfront without compensation by moving the line at which the public has an easement for access. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
This is the same continuum that we see today.There are 28 states that have a common law right to publicity and another 19 that have statutory based rights of publicity. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
It certainly offends Article 6 ECHR, and the Convention has been regarded as part of the English and a European ordre public (Loizidou v Turkey (Article 50), para 48; In re J [2005] UKHL 40, [2006] 1 AC 80, para 44); the Convention is also, in any event, based also on age-old rules of English law (cf. [read post]
14 May 2020, 3:42 am
I mean, they’re cheeseheads, for crying out loud. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
Well, if you're going to have to use the Sleekcraft test to evaluate likely confusion, exactly what work does the initial interest confusion doctrine do? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:35 am
We would have preferred to report on the actual rules, but since we don’t have them yet, we here in the CommLawBlog bunker present the following preliminary summary and analysis based on the official public notice issued by the Commission on February 26 (as well as the separate statements of the individual Commissioners). [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Former Qualcomm attorney and now-DOJ antitrust chief Makan Delrahim's division, with support from Department of Defense and Department of Energy officials, unsurprisingly spoke out in favor of Qualcomm's motion by filing a statement of interest. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:04 am
Other companies may rarely get demands for user data but could face less official requests to shut down certain accounts. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:04 am
Other companies may rarely get demands for user data but could face less official requests to shut down certain accounts. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:20 am
Friday, April 23, 2021, at 12:00 p.m.: The Public International Law & Policy Group will host a virtual roundtable on the war in Yemen and future of the peace process. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:00 am
The committee will hear testimony from Stacy Cummings, the official performing the duties of the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment; Robert Salesses, the official performing the duties of the assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense and global security and Gen. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
” Several weeks after the decision was handed down, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg added that she does not “expect that we’re going to see another affirmative action case, at least in education. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The present decision deals with a request for re-establishment. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
A university official claimed that "the university, as a public institution, is part of the state — therefore, [it] would be adverse to the university’s interests" to have UF professors "be paid to testify against the state" (emphasis mine). [read post]
