Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 9,820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council which requires judges to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous laws, has described Chevron as “a judge-made doctrine for the abdication of the judicial duty. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:43 am
Like all other constitutional actors, judges have a duty to follow the law. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:17 am
In re Tempting Brands Netherlands B.V., Serial No. 79161682 (April 11, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Bergsman).The Marks: The Board observed that there is no per se rule as to how the addition of a house mark or a designer name to similar product marks affects the analysis of whether marks are similar or dissimilar. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 7:08 pm
A judge may sign an arrest warrant authorizing arrest, but under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 18.03 a judge may also sign a search warrant that authorizes the arrest of a person. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Such efforts will be welcome, not least because they will represent a re-engagement between originalists and historians that, as Jonathan Gienapp has recently argued, New Originalism has largely tried to escape. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:27 am
In re Cumberland Valley Financial Corp., Serial No. 86827085 (April 5, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Hightower). [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:00 am
These IP Courts are designed to try cases involving patents, technical secrets, computer software, new plant varieties, integrated circuit layout designs, and cases regarding recognition of well-known trademarks and antitrust issues. 2.1. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:28 pm
New York City, like hundreds of other cities across the US, has designated itself a “sanctuary city. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:05 am
In re Shawn Crenshaw, Inc., Serial No. 86328394 (April 5, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Lynch).The Marks: The Board found that the applied-for mark is dominated by the word OVATION. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
See, e.g., In re Google Inc., 2013 WL 5423918, at *14 (N.D. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
No judge, no jury, is going to hand Facebook a win based on the genitalia of their lawyers. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:59 am
" In re Advance Indus. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
Samsung design patents case. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
It further privileges judges over non-judges, executive branch officials over legislators, and prosecutors over criminal defense lawyers. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:43 am
They’re nearly impossible to come by, and only 50-70 public first-come first-served spots are available on most days. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:53 am
My view: As suggested here, we have a failure of system design – a party who challenges a patent’s validity in court and loses should not later be allowed to re-challenge validity. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 6:49 am
“You’re not required to by any means. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:35 am
There’s nothing wrong with that, if that’s what they’re willing to do. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:45 pm
Administrative efficiency is separate: the likelihood that judges/etc. will make wrong decisions. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:08 am
Examiners, competitors, or judges might perceive the level of specificity in these drawings to be much greater than they actually are. [read post]
