Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 3941 - 3960 of 30,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Northwestern University, 953 F.3d 980 (7th Cir. 2020), cert. granted sub nom., Hughes v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am by Eugene Volokh
The Statute is not narrowly tailored does nor does it leave open ample alternative channels of communication. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
 The FAQs clarify that to establish a violation of the PSA, industry-wide injury to competition does not need to be proven, and the Department’s future rulemakings on the PSA will provide more guidance on the analysis to determine whether preferences will be considered undue. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
It is surprising to some that the absence of stock certificates, on its own, “does not preclude a finding that a particular individual has the rights of a shareholder” (Zwarycz v Marnia Const., Inc., 130 AD3d 922 [2d Dept 2015]). [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
”That bromide does not mean, however, that judges should seek the limelight to offer their perspectives on Court business or doctrine. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:42 pm by Aaron Moss
What he does not remember covers a broad array of important events and documents. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 5:02 am by SHG
Well of course she does, because of their “reputation for hackery. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article, Bronwyn E. [read post]