Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 3941 - 3960 of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2020, 6:01 am by Andrew Hamm
Ale USA Inc. 19-1124Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Georgianna Cool    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0581n.06 USA v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
§ 40.1-29, now provide additional flexibility for employers who wish to streamline their payroll process.Illinois - New Illinois law bans employee credit checksThompson Coburn LLPOn August 10, 2010, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signed into a law a bill that prohibits Illinois employers from running credit checks on prospective or current employees.Michigan - Michigan’s workplace smoking ban: are you compliant? [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm by Howard Knopf
Indeed, there’s a recent very important decision in the USA – which though not binding in Canada – could be very influential. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
  Thus, the offending search results will continue to appear against complainant’s name in the USA, Canada, South Africa, Australia, Japan etc. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See T-MOBILE USA, INC. v.Huawei Device USA, Inc., 115 F.Supp.3d 1184 (2015) (DTSA/UTSA case).Example 2. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:10 am by Frank J. Dürring
She cited to the Prussian General Helmuth von Moltke for “devising one of the world’s fist management matrices” when he assessed his officers on two scales: “clever v. dim and lazy v. energetic. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
At Above the Law, Elie Mystal reports on a new challenge to New Haven's firefighter promotion test in the wake of Ricci v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
(Justia), Permanent injunction imposed on the distributor of the Morpheus file-sharing software and stronger filtering software required (OUT-LAW), Ninth Circuit Holds Use in Commerce Only Creates Trademark Rights When the Use is Lawful (Intellectual Property Law Blog)Apotex Gets Out of Contempt Holding â€â [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am by Ben
A similar action in Florda failed - here the court found there was no state law to protect pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]