Search for: "Leaders v. State" Results 3941 - 3960 of 7,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
In Greece, the ruling New Democracy claimed the surveillance of opposition politicians, journalists and other civic leaders was lawful. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  Here, though, it is a question of horizontal (person to person) rather than vertical rights (state to individual). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:08 pm by Dan Flynn
As in the case of transfer, under the Supreme Court’s decision in Immigration & Naturalization Service v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Americans With Disabilities Act and New York State Human Rights Law does not protect plaintiff. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:08 pm
Medvedev said at a meeting with leaders of the two breakaway regions. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at The Hill, Rachel VanLandingham urges the justices to review Larrabee v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:43 am
By Mike Dorf In my first Verdict column, I discuss last week's Supreme Court decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC ("AFECFCP") v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:12 pm by Administrator
  The case, against alleged rebel leaders Abdallah Banda Aadaker Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus, is proceeding to trial on the following charges: violence to life, whether committed or attempted, within the meaning of article 8(2)(c)(i) of the Statute; intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a peacekeeping mission within the meaning of article 8(2)(e)(iii) of the Statute; and pillaging within the meaning of… [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:57 am by Jeff Wright
But it is encouraging to see our local and state leaders in lockstep on this important component in local efforts to combat COVID-19. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 8:48 am
  Later this spring, the Supreme Court will examine the issue of non-homicidal child rape in Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:51 pm by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
GOP Senate Leader Mitch McConnell called the amendment “unnecessary” and warned that it would give the DOJ and the federal government too much power over the states while Democrats, including Vice President Kamala Harris, applauded the passage of the amendment. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:25 am by John Nolon
”  In addition, the Supreme Court legally recognized that climate change is occurring in its Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 10:08 am
Microsoft has stated its support for comprehensive privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]