Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 4,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2008, 4:12 am
Most of the media attention, if the judgments get any attention on budget day, will be on Norris v United States, the extradition case in [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 pm
Now this case is similar to a case from the United Kingdom which is Evans v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Four years later, however, the Lords revisited the principles established by Fairchild in the case of Barker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
Baker & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government& Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 141. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:11 am
My read of the transcript of the February 6 State Farm v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
Spain kept not only Texas, but western territories that today comprise much of the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.... 1774, in London, England, at the conclusion of 2-1/2 weeks of proceedings in the case captioned Donaldson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 7:40 pm
As Judge Sack notes in his dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
The case also marks the debut of Harry Potter citations in the House of Lords. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
It almost sounds like a case the 11th Circuit reversed, U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:52 pm
Lord Justice Lawrence Collins concurred, but Lord Justice Wall dissented: "In my judgment," he stated, "...it seems to me clear that the fundamental assumption behind the agreement, and critical to the making of the order, was the assumption that Mrs. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
Malcolm is headed to the Lords and frankly, I don’t think anyone expects the Lords to leave it alone, so there is no doubt more to come. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 11:59 am
Both sides can appeal a decision to the Council (generally stating reasonable grounds such as procedure or new information). [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
Regardless whether a particular jurisdiction is a "notice/prejudice" state, see Prince Georges Cty. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
Harley Lord, et al., 851 So.2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
Lord Justice Longmore (who gave the leading judgment) stated that the whole purpose of the balance achieved by the Bermuda Form (English arbitration but applying New York law to issues arising under the policy) was that judicial remedies in respect of the award should only be those permitted by English law. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
Stewart v. [read post]
