Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 20,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2014, 4:42 pm
[T[hey thought they were being very clever by putting it into a 271(b) box and avoiding the strict liability consequences of what they were doing, but also avoiding the possibility of an end run of the patent law. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
If you don’t live in Illinois, you may not be subject to the jurisdiction of any Illinois court. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:44 am
B tries to resist A, but A continues to pummel B. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
The judge then explained that [i]t is apparent from § 1030(a)(5)(B) and (C) that Congress knew exactly how to require proof that a defendant's access to a computer was unauthorized. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
In other words, if the basis for police intrusion does not rise to reasonable suspicion, they can't claim the need to search for officer safety without. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
” Rule 1.16(b). [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:59 pm
If you really don't have to "wing it", don't. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:08 am
Since the media doesn't report much on evidentiary objections and rulings during trial, it's hard to say whether the judge has indicated she'll allow or disallow the Government's vice-presidential theory to be considered as a basis for guilt as opposed to just for matters related to intent. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:41 pm
Fortunately, I wasn't confused when Judge Kram's courtroom had a big sign on the outside saying "Judge Leonard B. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:56 pm
An aerospace company found this out the hard way in Global Aerospace Corp., B-414514 (July 3, 2017). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:46 am
” Waller’s initial appearance in federal court Monday was brief and he didn’t enter a plea. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am
So exactly how do the claims in the ’375 patent cover something that isn’t a machine and isn’t patent eligible? [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:24 am
They are excluded from patentability in so far as a claim relates to excluded subject matter "as such". [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
Certain types of employment claims, including age claims and wage and hour claims, have very specific requirements for what constitutes a proper release; and, as the Pennsylvania court highlighted, merely stating that a matter is “completely” settled does not adequately close off potential claims. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
I personally have dealt with more than two dozen exit ban matters in China. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:29 am
Rev & T C §§19282, 26451. 7. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:47 am
§ 112(b), which provides that “[t]he specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:05 pm
That part of the case didn't really surprise me, the relief was more surprising: Defendant is permanently enjoined from violating § 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act of 1934,15 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
That’s unfortunate because the outcome matters a lot to Mapp and others in his position. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" Petitioner asserted that she was very shocked and did not see the termination coming, such that she asked for an explanation three times; again, petitioner was told that "some people fit in here and some people don't, and you just don't fit in. [read post]
