Search for: "Mark"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 152,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2024, 9:25 pm
BTW, Mark, have I missed any outbreaks and recalls linked to your product? [read post]
SOLAR . . . or So Not?!? SOLAR is a Popular Mark; do any of These Uses Violate the FTC Green Guides?
2 Jun 2011, 11:21 pm
Does it not then follow logically that if the goods/services offered under a mark involve energy generation and the mark used in association with the product describes a different form of energy generation, then that mark would be deceptively misdescriptive? [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:41 am
Collins maintained that the mark "is not prominently placed on the front of the packaging as an indicator of source for the goods (as i sthe Applicant's mark ... [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:57 pm
Trade marks are renewable. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Here, the third-party marks contain additional wording, which "clearly make these marks different from SWISS and from SWISS MADE. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
In a 71-page opinion, the Board sustained a Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark BRUCE WINSTON for gemstones and fine jewelry, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the mark HARRY WINSTON and the registered mark WINSTON for jewelry. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 12:08 pm
According to the ruling of the European Court of Justice on this mark, applying a colour to a specific part of the shoe can constitute a trade mark and fall outside the substantial value absolute ground.Distinctiveness of the mark needs to be assessed with reference to the goods and/or services for which protection is sought and the perception of the relevant public. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:29 am
Disney maintains dozens of character mark and design mark registrations for Mickey Mouse in the U.S. and throughout the world. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 11:50 am
Here’s what Jan writes:No small feat: Converse wins Dutch Supreme Court case on trade mark exhaustionby Jan JacobiAs explained in an earlier blog, proving trade mark exhaustion (within the meaning of Article 15 of the Trade Mark Directive) can be a very challenging task. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:32 am
Can something be simultaneously iconic and lack distinctiveness under trade mark law? [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
In re RSI Systems, LLC, 88 USPQ2d 1445 (TTAB 2008) [precedential].RSI for "printing machines": As to the marks, the Board not surprisingly found the letters RSI to be a prominent feature of Applicant's mark, and it concluded that "the literal portions of the marks are legally identical and the marks in their entirety are very similar in sound, appearance, meaning, and commercial impression. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 11:10 am
Mark Smolik gave the second-day keynote, speaking on the topic of winning strategies for new business: insights on innovation from a chief legal officer. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 4:12 am
To auto enthusiasts, Mark IV recalls heady days @1970, when less than ten grand would acquire either a carefree Austin-Healey Sprite Mark IV, or the elegant authority of the Lincoln Mark IV (with a 7L engine and those novel intermittent wipers). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 7:33 pm
To auto enthusiasts, Mark IV recalls heady days @1970, when less than ten grand would acquire either a carefree Austin-Healey Sprite Mark IV, or the elegant authority of the Lincoln Mark IV (with a 7L engine and those novel intermittent wipers). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:33 am
Several companies have “overhead”-including registered marks, including several who market garage door products and/or services. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:00 am
In March 2017, the Board considered that there was no likelihood of confusion between the Applicant’s mark and the Intervener’s mark, in light of the weak distinctive character of the earlier mark, the low degree of visual similarity between the signs, the lack of phonetic and conceptual similarity, and the varying degrees of similarity for some of the goods covered by the marks. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
Hence, it is vitally important for owners of marks registered in classes 32 and 33 to monitor for any potentially infringing marks in the wider beverage market. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 5:52 pm
Hence, it is vitally important for owners of marks registered in classes 32 and 33 to monitor for any potentially infringing marks in the wider beverage market. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:38 am
"The government cannot refuse to register disparaging marks because it disapproves of the expressive messages conveyed by the marks. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:51 am
Mar. 15, 2011)] applies in false marking cases. [read post]
