Search for: "Mark E. Howe"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 7,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
How did this preference come to be? [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 2:51 am
It will also discuss in-depth the British Mandate and the San Remo Conferencehttp://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/international-conference-the-impact-of-world-war-one-on-palestine-tickets-12138948923? [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
If the book is an extension or outgrowth of the author’s existing business (e.g., Chicken Soup for the Soul®), approval and ownership of the title – which also functions as a service mark – becomes a critical issue. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 2:47 am
The Board observed once again, however, that even if applicant were the first and only user of the mark, the mark would still be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1).And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog comment: Well, would you have? [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:29 am
The Examining Attorney refused to register either mark under Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act of 1945, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
How could the system defend itself and fair market actors against trade mark trolls, wonders Jeremy? [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 1:13 am
Dunoff and Mark A. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:34 pm
How could this be? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:34 pm
How could this be? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 2:15 pm
That’s probably a welcome relief to Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Dr. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Harm the reputation/impair the distinctiveness of a mark: what does that mean? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
James E. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
Reuters reports that this decision marks the semi-autonomous province’s “first military foray into Syria’s war. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:34 pm
" Id. at *14.[4] "[W]e affirm the district court's grant of JMOL of no infringement. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:49 am
Mark’s School and Harvard University, the Navy left as much of a mark on Mr. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 5:41 am
Here are four recent appeals from mere descriptiveness refusals under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
(b) If neither of those alternatives is correct, how should the provision then be interpreted? [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:21 am
Nor could they determine how large it was or how far it extended into Fowlkes’s body. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Marie-Andrée tells how it went. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:30 pm
Public Health 101 -- How to take all the pleasure out of eating and drinking.Public Health 201 -- How to turn a conversation on any topic into a discussion of antibiotic resistant sexually transmitted disease.And Public.Health 301 -- How to take all the pleasure out of eating and drinking … by talking about antibiotic resistant sexually transmitted disease.The truth is that public health is a field full of people who enjoy life. [read post]
