Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 3941 - 3960 of 7,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2013, 9:36 am by Will Baude
Const. art I, § 5, cl. 1 (“a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day”); id. cl. 4. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am by Ron Coleman
This should be the subject of national, not local, policy — a decision for Congress, not state legislatures. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:14 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  And thereafter, Congress may well wash its hands of cybersecurity and mark the problem “sovled” — which, come to think of it, might very well be the best possible result. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:05 am by Trevor Timm
Crovitz claims, and in fact, they show why it is vital Congress passes substantive NSA reform immediately. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm by Dennis Crouch
Without a doubt, there is merit to the professors' case, although I bristle at the letter's broad-brush statements and overt stance that is pro-large-corporate-entity. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:11 pm by Cindy Cohn and Trevor Timm
Ron Wyden and Mark Udall have been saying this for a long time. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
(That decision is “Starbucks I,” in case you’re keeping track.) [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:20 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Today, I want to discuss the full range of activities we undertake to protect the American people. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am by Bexis
We’ve already blogged twice about the patently meritless U.S. ex rel. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Dennis Crouch
 On that note, Mark Chandler (Cisco's General Counsel) recently testified in Congress regarding the new "consumer scam" of enforcing patents against Cisco customers. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Reg. 67985, 67988-89 (FDA Nov. 13, 2013) (discussing “recent court decisions”).We turn to the FDA’s cost benefit “analysis” (use of quotation marks intentional), which consists of only one paragraph, so we’ll quote it in full:The economic benefits to the public health from adoption of the proposed rule are not quantified. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:24 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fifty years ago – in Bismarck, North Dakota – Attorney General Kennedy addressed the National Congress of American Indians. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm by Barney A. Allison
  With the House T&I Committee expected to begin marking up a rail bill, Ms. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
” Id. at 334 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:10 am by Robert Kraft
” Armistice Day was primarily a day set aside to honor veterans of World War I, but in 1954, after World War II had required the greatest mobilization of soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen in the Nation’s history; after American forces had fought aggression in Korea, the 83rd Congress, at the urging of the veterans service organizations, amended the Act of 1938 by striking out the word “Armistice” and inserting in its place the word “Veterans. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/X8YzTm8g8i -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-11-03: Quincy Jones sues Michael Jackson's estate over royalties ht… http://t.co/KiWm8YV2Im -> Infosys settles with US government for $34 million over visa dispute http://t.co/aW5KlDy5bV -> TVTechnology: Settling the Aereo Issue http://t.co/TqkYIK2Ttb -> Adobe cyber attack to trigger flood of legal action, forecast lawyers http://t.co/XieCA3EggY -> 'Anonymous' collective hackers intensify cyber attacks across… [read post]