Search for: "Matter of Jones" Results 3941 - 3960 of 5,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Jones, the Court ruled that using GPS technology to track a vehicle was a search that violated the Fourth Amendment because it was not authorized by a warrant.The difficulty for Carpenter is that a 5-4 majority of the Court in Jones rested its ruling on the fact that the police had to trespass on the target’s vehicle (by placing a GPS tracker on the vehicle without permission) in order to be able to gather the locational data that it subsequently collected. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:41 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
By Gwendolynne Reid, Cherice Escobar Jones, and Mya Poe Biases in scholarly citations against scholars of color promote racial inequality, stifle intellectual analysis, and can harm patients and communities. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon De Reya Data Matters had a post “Data protection: UK Government sets out its position on “essential equivalence” between the UK and EU”. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 15 October 2024 there was a trial of a preliminary issue in the data protection case of  Joseph Pacini, Carsten Geyer v Dow Jones & Company Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Jones, who was FirstEnergy’s CEO and a director at the time of the scheme; and Michael J. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:21 pm by Chris Dreyer
John Paul Jones knew they couldn’t win against the British in conventional warfare yet, choosing instead to hit them on the battlefield of his choice (where) in a way he could win (how). [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
However, self-imposed museum policies and procedures in this matter usually remain limited in terms of the grievance procedure for an external party. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:07 am by Joseph Parise
Over the years, the index morphed into today’s Dow Jones Industrial Average. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
Lauderdale Division.Civil procedure -- Default -- Vacation -- Excusable neglect -- In action for breach of contract, open account and unjust enrichment in which default had been entered for defendants' failure to file answer to original complaint, where trial court first granted defendants' motion for vacation of default judgment on grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on forum selection clause, then upon plantiff's motion for rehearing determined it did have… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The divisions among some of the Justices in respect to “textualism” or “purposivism” is not always absolute but rather a matter of degree or emphasis. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:20 am by Michael Ehline
Jones was a case where the judges ruled that the police had no right to attach a tracking device under the defendant’s car without a warrant. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:29 am by Ron Friedmann
These are still hourly billing matters (not AFA) but once you hit the cap, “It’s all over. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
" But before the meeting started, two of those members were informed that they were no longer eligible to serve on the committee, "meaning they can't participate in the committee's recommendation to the full board on matters involving Carter's contract. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:58 am
§ § 170(c), 501(c)(3), especially as those I.R.C. provisions were construed in Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 4 - The defence of publication on a matter of public interest Section 4 abolishes the common law defence of ‘Reynolds qualified privilege’/journalistic qualified privilege (evolved from the dicta in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] UKHL 45) and replaces it with the defence of ‘publication on a matter of public interest’. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
(Fourth issue) The Supreme Court’s judgment  Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Kitchin, with whom Lord Hodge agreed, gave the majority judgment, with Lord Carnwath dissenting in part. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 4:13 am by Emma Snell
“And it allows the military not to expend much more resource on a battle for the steelworks which was military irrelevant and turn to what really matters now – the battle of the Donbas. [read post]