Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 3941 - 3960 of 6,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
Two interesting cases have been delivered by the ECHR in the last few weeks: Mago and others v Bosnia-Herzegovina and Yordanova and others v Bulgaria. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
Two interesting cases have been delivered by the ECHR in the last few weeks: Mago and others v Bosnia-Herzegovina and Yordanova and others v Bulgaria. [read post]
13 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Thomas (1990) 40 E.T.R. 107 (B.C.C.A.) and Smith v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am by INFORRM
The offending comments Mr Calver’s blog contained various comments (set out at para 33 of the judgment) criticising the conduct and operation of Manorbier Council in general and individual councillors in particular. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We’re pleased to report that, in Martin v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164], in which the High Court was considering a similar question as to whether the Election Tribunal constituted under the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, had the power to pass an injunction so as to restrain an elected representative from assuming office pending adjudication of an election petition filed against him. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:47 am by Mark S. Nelson
In Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago, et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 am by Rachit Buch
The offending comments Mr Calver’s blog contained various comments (set out at para 33 of the judgment) criticising the conduct and operation of Manorbier Council in general and individual councillors in particular. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am by INFORRM
David Richards J held that this would therefore have involved a significant departures from two fundamental common law principles: first, the principle of open justice requires that trials are conducted in public; and, second, the principle of natural justice includes the right of a party to know the case against him and the evidence on which it is based (relying on Al Rawi v The Security Service [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) [10]-[13] (Lord Dyson); and later, in respect of open justice, to… [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
(Gottlieb Aff. dated 4/10/11 at 8–9; Tr. 140–41; 361; 409–10.) [read post]