Search for: "People v. David" Results 3941 - 3960 of 6,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” As Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi visited the seaside tourist town of Sharm el-Sheikh for the first time since the crash, he sought to “reassure people” and maintained that the government "will announce the results with absolute transparency and clarity," the Times tells us. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court began building out sexual harassment law from a Title VII case in 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Fake News: A Legal Perspective,  Journal of Internet Law (Apr. 2017), David O. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
To reach this aim, living standards of the people had to be raised and productive capacities developed. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Jedediah Britton-Purdy David Singh Grewal Thanks to Jack Balkin for letting us comment on his Cycles of Constitutional Time. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Young issued a Notice Order to Show Cause (Doc. 212.00) ordering David S. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:59 pm by Mark Savill
Full article can be found here Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn to be appealed The court case of Northwood Solihull ltd v Fearn has now been given leave to appeal. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:27 am
The late Harry Blackmun wrote, in dissent, in Herrera v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:59 pm by Mark Savill
Full article can be found here Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn to be appealed The court case of Northwood Solihull ltd v Fearn has now been given leave to appeal. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:40 am by Maxwell Kennerly
(If you're itching for more about libel-in-fiction, peruse the cases citing Bindrim v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
The timing suggested that the employer may have investigated its employees’ immigration status because it was unhappy with the results of a union election; as the majority opinion, written by Judge David Tatel, noted, “the company claimed that after the election it put the Social Security numbers given by all the voting employees into the Social Security Administration’s online database and discovered that most of the numbers were either nonexistent or belonged to other… [read post]