Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 15,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 12:38 pm
The case, ACLU v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 1:20 pm
EFF recently filed an amicus brief in the Washington case State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 7:21 am
These are very hard cases to win.The case is Fabrikant v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:41 am
The people have a right to know what checks the executive branch has put in place to regulate law enforcement's use of the powerful new surveillance tools at its disposal. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:01 am
The power of stingrays, and the lengths to which police will go to conceal their use, are demonstrated by an ongoing case in Florida, State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:08 am
As a Harvard law professor, he earned fame as a civil libertarian, Zionist, and New Deal power broker. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
Another landmark case is Pascale v Pascale in 1988. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Another landmark case is Pascale v Pascale in 1988. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
It’s not a surprising move when you seek power but your views on theism and democracy are disfavored by the people in large numbers. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:51 am
But in the canon of Supreme Court cases, United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm
Back in 2012, Supreme Court ruled that the mandate is constitutional in its highly controversial decision in NFIB v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
The court would have to send a copy of the draft order to people who have registered an interest in seeing such orders and include sufficient information to provide them with a basis to challenge the application. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am
It is also a critical mistake to require government-issued ID, because that gives government too much power to abuse people by withholding identification or corruptly misidentifying them. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:39 am
Over at the Art Law Blog, Donn Zaretsky points to Gaylord v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
But that power extends only to people who are dangerous. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:56 am
Original Article 05/20/2010 By Wendy Kaminer In what will likely be one of her last victories as solicitor general, Elena Kagan persuaded the Supreme Court to embrace an expansive vision of federal power that should agitate right-wing advocates of freedom and small central government, but probably won't, because U.S v Comstock, involved the power to detain people deemed "sexually dangerous" under the popular Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety… [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:28 pm
That focused on a consideration of the power of these ideologies to discipline people commonly gendered male, and through that disciplining deepen the disciplining of individuals gendered female. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:10 pm
After establishing that that the campus was "open to the public," the Court ruled the People had not met their burden:[t]he Court finds that the People offered insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the . . . order to the defendant to leave the SCCC campus had a legitimate purpose, rationally related to the power to maintain order on the campus, or that its enforcement did not violate an independent right of the defendant.Therefore, the Court finds this… [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 8:23 am
-Silver v. [read post]
