Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 3941 - 3960 of 12,242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 5:44 am by Joy Waltemath
He alleged that only that the restaurant employed him and individual people who are agents of the employer cannot be sued as employers under Title VII. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:48 am by mdkeenan
However, in People v Tatera, the state was allowed to use the HGN test to show how the defendant disobeyed the officer’s instructions by failing to keep his hands out of his pockets and at his side. [read post]
24 May 2018, 6:59 am by rachel@masslomap.org
STANDARD DEDUCTION v ITEMIZED DEDUCTION Can we still itemize and can still deduct . . . ? [read post]
  The stated purpose of the new law is to give people more control over their personal data and make it easier to access it. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And they did not walk in a way that took up most of the sidewalk and made it necessary for me to either wait for them to pass or dodge them.I had never thought about these things or imagined that walking down the street was different for me from what it was for men of the same height and build. [read post]
22 May 2018, 7:38 pm by David E. Bernstein
Skillman Hardware Co., 76 N.J. 45 (1908); People v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:14 am by Joy Waltemath
Ultimately four people were hired—three Caucasian applicants and one Hispanic internal applicant. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:46 am by Scott Bomboy
The 2013 policy change, known as the Cole memo, focused federal attorneys on pursuing cases against people who sold marijuana to minors, took part in interstate trafficking, were members of criminal gangs, or used federal property for marijuana purposes. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In Charles I of Spain (later the most Catholic Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V), Magellan found a willing patron. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Worthington & Anor v Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd (2018) EWCA Civ 1125 The Court of Appeal on an instance of tenancy management going bad, very bad indeed. [read post]