Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 55,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2018, 3:43 pm
Commentators have treated the Court’s decision in Whitford v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm
I thought the landlord would lose Daejan v Benson, and, as you all know, the landlord won (see our note here). [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm
I thought the landlord would lose Daejan v Benson, and, as you all know, the landlord won (see our note here). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Co. v Hereford Ins. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Co. v Hereford Ins. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:39 pm
In the case of Kirby v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:23 am
This is change that is in some sense legal, perhaps even equivalent in significance to a formal amendment, but falls outside the Article V process. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
However, the recent Supreme Court decision in Utility Regulatory Group v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
However, the recent Supreme Court decision in Utility Regulatory Group v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:01 am
I recently read a case, Ayala and Chesapeake Exploration LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:30 am
On the other hand, Congress has repeatedly conferred power on the federal courts to hear ex parte proceedings that feature no opponent at all. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
See Bonito Boats, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 1:32 am
v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
While Michigan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:33 am
Dornoch v Westminster International [2009] EWHC 201 (Admlty) relates the right of marine insurers under the Marine Insurance Act 1906 to take over a vessel after it has become a constructive total loss as the result of a collision.This preliminary hearing concerned the court's power to order a person to be added as a new party, in the context of the EC regulation on jurisdiction in international cases (Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001) (Jurisdiction Regulation). [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:28 pm
Title: Jerez-Sanchez v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 3:01 am
EPA and Hein v. [read post]
