Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 3941 - 3960 of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Brooks, 12 S.W. 975 (1889), overruled on other grounds by Dixie Glass Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Erin Miller
   He made his name investigating public corruption in Illinois, and Rutan was about whether the free speech clause prohibited the Illinois governor from hiring only Republicans for state jobs. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And the immunity applies whether or not service providers decide to control what is posted on their sites. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published four rulings since our last Round Up: 00006-21 Hackett v Hull Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 04283-21 Friel v thejc.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 05855-21 Duah v metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 3 Harassment (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 07938-21 various v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach –… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 11:51 pm
Continental Casualty Co., 393 U.S. 145, 150, 89 S.Ct. 337, 340 (1968). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:57 am
Full report: Family Law Week.A Local Authority v A Mother & Ors [2012] EWHC 1637 (Fam) (15 June 2012)Public law proceedings. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]