Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 4,670
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2010, 8:28 am
Thus, in reaction to Furman v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:10 pm
The case is Tapia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:25 am
"As stated above, there is no clear law laid down on this point. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am
Com. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532 and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
Minnesota and New York Times Co. v U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 2:30 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 5:47 am
In Quinlan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:57 pm
In 1972, the Supreme Court had struck down all existing capital punishment laws in one of the most far-reaching opinions in its history, called Furman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
Supreme Court ruled in Kyllo v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:54 am
A “new normal” continues to take root at law firms, according to a survey showing increases in the use of alternative fee arrangements. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
Sherrilyn Ifill of The Root argues the case goes beyond the “the age-old state sovereignty versus federal courts story”; rather, she contends, “the condition of our prison system is a reflection of irresponsible state and federal policies that have often been expedient, but fiscally and morally unsound. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
The paper, prepared for a recent conference at Western New England College School of Law marking the 35th anniversary of the Massachusetts Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Wilkes v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:06 pm
Besides such political issues, the two opinions G 3/08 (12 May 2010) of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO and Bilski v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:33 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:53 pm
The case is Charara v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:58 am
Ghailani will receive, it is important not to lose sight of the root cause of the outcome: he was subjected to coercion during his interrogation. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:28 am
He summarizes the legal issue as follows: The recent court opinion in Comcast v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:58 am
Petsafe Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWHC 2908 (Admin) (16 November 2010): Do pets have human rights? [read post]
