Search for: "Samuels" Results 3941 - 3960 of 14,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 1:00 am by Scott J. Limmer
” Three Justices (Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh) issued an Alito-written statement critiquing the district court’s decision for misreading the FDPA as over-specific and possibly requiring federal executions to use less humane state-mandated procedures. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 7:30 am by jlucivero
., Marie-Louise Samuels Parmer, Esq., and the law firm of Holland & Knight LLP, who each donated their time to assist the retrial team for more than two years after the Supreme Court’s ruling; investigator Kate O’Shea; and Martin McClain, Esq., who jointly represented Hildwin along with Nina Morrison of the Innocence Project in the litigation that led to the reversal of his 1985 conviction and death sentence. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Bhagwat, Crossing Doctrines: Conflating Standing and the Merits Under the Establishment Clause, (Washington University Law Review, Forthcoming).Samuel D. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 4:04 pm
Vera Mironova, Loubna Mrie, & Sam Whitt, Commitment to Rebellion: Evidence from Syria Renard Sexton, Unpacking the Local Resource Curse: How Externalities and Governance Shape Social Conflict Douglas Page & Samuel Whitt, Confronting Wartime Sexual Violence: Public Support for Survivors in Bosnia Daehee Bak, Kerry Chávez, & Toby Rider, Domestic Political Consequences of International Rivalry Data Set Feature Brandon J. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 1:59 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
On March 2, the administration announced Trump will nominate Jocelyn Samuels and Andrea R. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:16 am by ernst
  NYU Law’s Samuel Issacharoff supervised her writing of the note, which originated in an undergraduate thesis at Yale supervised by Naomi Lamoreaux.FDR Dedicates New FRB Building, 1937 (LC)In administrative law, the sine qua non of agency independence lies in the enabling statute. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:34 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Majority Decision By a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court affirmed.Justice Samuel A. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle reports that Justice Samuel Alito’s questions suggested that he is doubtful that the abortion providers have the legal right to sue on behalf of their patients, but that “his colleagues did not pick up the thread. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Samuel Alito, a member of the minority in Whole Woman’s Health, sharply questions Rikelman on the third-party standing of the abortion providers, finding several of her answers “amazing” or “highly debatable. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:10 pm by Adam Feldman
Jackson Masonry, while Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito filed concurrences in Monasky v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:05 pm by Valeria Negron
Justice Samuel Alito emphasized the standing issue, questioning why there were no women involved in the lawsuit. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm by Ronald Mann
That point came out early on when Justice Samuel Alito asked Rapawy whether his “argument [is] that disgorgement is never possible or that disgorgement has been interpreted too broadly by the courts? [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:28 am by Amy Howe
Rikelman quickly faced a barrage of questions from Justice Samuel Alito regarding whether her clients had a legal right to challenge the Louisiana law, known as “standing,” at all. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:03 am by Pratheepan Gulasekaram
Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion held that Kansas’ application of its state identity-theft and fraud statutes to the noncitizen respondents was neither expressly nor impliedly preempted by federal immigration laws related to verifying eligibility to work (for a discussion of express versus implied preemption – and the latter’s subsets of conflict, obstacle and field preemption – see the argument preview). [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:47 am by Gabrielle Kolencik
Justice Samuel Alito, delivering the decision for the majority, stated that, “the mere fact that an I–9 contains an item of information, such as a name or address, does not mean that information ‘contained in’ the I–9 is used whenever that name or address is later employed. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am by Kari Hong
Justice Samuel Alito remarked that “the fundamental point of habeas is to secure release from what’s claimed to be unlawful executive custody. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
When the courtroom takes the bench this morning, there is an opinion from Justice Samuel Alito in Kansas v. [read post]