Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 3941 - 3960 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm by Theresa Smith
 First: that the district court misapplied the primary significance test and failed to recognize the importance of verb use. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:01 am by Jon Katz
Sixth Judicial District Court, 542 U.S. 177 (2004). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision in 1977, by a 2-1 margin, with each judge writing separate opinions. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm by Dale Carpenter
“In each of these cases,” we argued, “the plaintiffs won the identified benefit at the district court level, lost it on appeal to the Sixth Circuit, see DeBoer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm by John Floyd
The prosecutor accountability site says misconduct occurs between two sets of rules: first, “the legal rules that bind prosecutors so as to ensure due process – the state and federal constitution, statutory law, rules of criminal procedure, judicial orders, and the like;” and “the ethical standards of the legal profession as expressed in each state’s bar rules of professional responsibility and similar professional codes. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On June 16, 2017 – without seeking either rehearing in the First District Court of Appeal or review by the Supreme Court – losing appellants Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity filed a letter asking the Supreme Court to depublish the First District’s (Division 1) recent opinion in Sierra Club v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:48 am by Dan Flynn
Judge Gering said the basement court room built for the BPI v ABC trial, that ended midway through its fourth week, is a valuable addition to the First Judicial District’s venues. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:12 am by Steve Vladeck
And although Davila claimed that his appellate lawyer therefore provided ineffective assistance, the district court held that he had defaulted that claim by failing to raise it in his state collateral post-conviction review proceeding. [read post]