Search for: "State v. Frame"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 6,713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:09 am
The problem for plaintiff in Castagna v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:04 am
Thus the issue of Rosemond’s intent, versus what the law requires, was framed. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:28 pm
Reasonable time frame? [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 3:01 am
In a March 3, 2014 order (here), the Court granted the defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari in Indiana State District Council of Laborers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:03 am
General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:41 pm
His Lordship stated at p. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
See Reading & Bates Construction Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We know from Guenther v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Framing becomes really important at this point. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:17 pm
The rule cites Sylvester v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
The government’s own definition states that a new human organism begins at fertilization. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm
The morning’s proceedings begin with a return to Al-Nashiri’s alleged role in the attack on the French oil tanker the M/V Limburg in Yemen in October 2002. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
This essay is adapted from his foreword to Eugene Volokh, Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
Spear Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
Spear Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:26 am
Hobby Lobby Part IV -- The myth of underinclusivenessHobby Lobby Part V -- Whose Religious Exercise? [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:16 am
Hobby Lobby Part IV -- The myth of underinclusivenessHobby Lobby Part V -- Whose Religious Exercise? [read post]
