Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 29,348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm
Jewel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:01 am
DWD could be stating here that being quarantined is good cause. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
In light of that analysis, the Court found Business’s transactions not to have constituted a sale or use under § 11-102(a), and not to be liable for sales tax in the audit period. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:58 pm
State and Misskelley v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:46 am
In Tyagunova v Russia, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has scrutinized an investigation of rape allegations in Russia. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:45 pm
In State of Oregon v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:04 pm
Robert Murray v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 7:20 am
Fillmore County, where the Supreme Court granted cert., vacated the judgment, and remanded the case for consideration in light of Fulton v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
See Schriber-Schroth Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:18 pm
In Satey v. [read post]
Attacking References Individually: Obviousness Rejection Upheld by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
14 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
§103 obviousness rejection in light of the KSR v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
Thus, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, a rational fact finder could conclude that defendant acquired the video and exercised control over it and the images (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]). [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 7:39 pm
Rick Kittel won in State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
In January, it was a seven-year long trade mark battle between L’Oréal v eBay before the UK courts (and the CJEU) that bit the dust. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:04 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Lamot v Gondek, 163 AD2d 678, the court said it had “unambiguously established” that such a remedy includes the consideration of "pension rights [that are] established with reasonable certainty" and ruled that the Commissioner's order that Employee “take steps to involve the Office of the State Comptroller and the New York State and Local Retirement System — presumably to have them provide an actual pension — was an abuse of… [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Where an ad is literally false, the court has the power enjoin the use without reference to the impact of the ad on the buying public (McNeil-PCC v Bristol-Myers Squibb)(1991)). [read post]
