Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 4,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 pm
The key to this inquiry is the substitution of the agency for district courts as a decision-maker on patent validity. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
bas Klubs v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
Avola v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
The FTC does not state any objective criterion for the alleged difference in performance. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
California State Lands Commission (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
This principle was established by the United States in one of the most dramatic of the post-World War II proceedings, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
The three categories identified by Lord Diplock in Council of the Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (essentially for review of administrative action) are not exhaustive. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
From Geek.com:AMARC Enterprises, a supplement maker, advertises the benefits of its product — a drug called Poly-MVA — through using supposed customer claims about it. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
K-V Pharm. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:38 pm
In Principle Solutions Group, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Recommendations to Congress, federal and state policy-makers, relevant federal agencies, and medical associations, through the social model lens of valuing the lives of persons with disabilities. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
United States and Carter v. [read post]
