Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 3941 - 3960 of 57,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens, born or naturalized, under the stipulations of this Convention. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:35 am by SHG
Kansas don’t need no stinkin’ rule, and in Kahler v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
Moreover, everything that he said in his opinion sounded entirely plausible, so I can't really say with any confidence that individual cities should have the ability to sue video providers for not getting a state franchise and paying the applicable fees. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:34 pm by Public Employment Law Press
A settlement agreement signed by an attorney may bind a client even where it exceeds the attorney's actual authority, if the attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; Popovic v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
In response to the employee’s challenging his termination during his probationary period the Appellate Division said that "A probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reason in the absence of any demonstration that the dismissal was for a constitutionally-impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory or decisional law" citing such decisions as Walsh v New York State Thruway Auth., 24 AD3d 755; Matter of York… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Joel Edan Friedlander, Friedlander & Gorris, has posted The Desegregation Decrees of the Delaware Court of Chancery, which is forthcoming in the Delaware Law Review:It is often said that the United States Supreme Court affirmed Chancellor Collins J. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:34 pm by Public Employment Law Press
A settlement agreement signed by an attorney may bind a client even where it exceeds the attorney's actual authority, if the attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; Popovic v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:51 pm
  They said he couldn't be sold till he'd been in the State six months, and he hadn't been there that long yet. [read post]