Search for: "State v. Save" Results 3941 - 3960 of 11,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm by Michael S. Levine
Century Indemnity Co., case number CTQ-2016-00005, in the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, where he points out how a win for Global Re could result in a huge windfall for the reinsurer by saving on its defense costs, since reinsurers typically must pay both indemnity and defense costs. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm by Michael S. Levine
Century Indemnity Co., case number CTQ-2016-00005, in the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, where he points out how a win for Global Re could result in a huge windfall for the reinsurer by saving on its defense costs, since reinsurers typically must pay both indemnity and defense costs. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm by Giles Peaker
DA & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2017) EWHC 1446 (Admin) This was the judicial review of the ‘reduced’ benefit cap – £20,000 pa  outside London, £23,000 in London, brought by claimants who were all single mothers with children, including children under two years old. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 1:56 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
We meant what we said, when we described in R. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am by Staley Smith
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
In a case from last year, West Philadelphia Achievement Charter Elementary School v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Jack Sharman
Like all of us, Raskolnikov – the nihilist student who without any real reason kills an old  woman – is guilty of original sin and saved, so to speak, only by suffering. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Assisted Suicide Battles Rage in Nearly Every State: Is Your State Next? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
Alternatively the couple are required to have substantial savings: £16,000 plus 2.5 times the shortfall in the sponsor’s earnings. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:56 am by John Lewis
” The DOJ brief concluded, “Just as the savings clause was held not to encompass the state-law rule at issue in Concepcion, it does not encompass the analogous federal-law rule that the Seventh and Ninth Circuits derived from the NLRA. [read post]