Search for: "State v. So"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 117,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am
Under governing law, that is a judicial function. 2) The FTC’s undue haste to categorize AI training as likely infringement may be related to another error: the Comment’s implicit understanding of AI training as a singular activity, rather than as another manifestation of something copyright law has dealt with many times before—i.e., so-called “non-expressive” use in which copying is undertaken not to distribute the copied material directly or indirectly but… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:32 am
Sales v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
Garland v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:50 am
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:28 am
As we observed earlier this year, courts and legislatures across the country are still trying to figure out the meaning and limits of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
A. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
Ahmed v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:06 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
So if you or your client face potential loss of voting, management, control, or ownership rights in a closely-held business, be proactive. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 3:13 am
McKnight v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
When the EU acts on education via one of these indirect routes, or when Member State action on education falls within the scope of EU law (as in Commission v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
Trump Mot. to Intervene 3, Texas v. [read post]
