Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 3941 - 3960 of 20,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2021, 5:37 am by SHG
Yesterday, in a Supreme Court case called Brnovich v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist * Facebook Still Can’t Dismiss Sex Trafficking Victims’ Lawsuit in Texas State Court * Craigslist Denied Section 230 Immunity for Classified Ads from 2008–ML v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:00 pm
 Yesterday, the Supreme Court upheld the partial birth abortion ban in Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:00 pm
 Yesterday, the Supreme Court upheld the partial birth abortion ban in Gonzales v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 2:05 pm by John Elwood
The question that the the justices have been asked to decide is whether an equal protection challenge to facially race-neutral admission criteria can go forward when members of the racial groups targeted for decline still receive a balanced share of admissions offers commensurate with their share of the applicant pool. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Maryland Supreme Court first adopted the doctrine in an 1847 case, Irwin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:33 am by Rory Little
” The breadth of this last point, however, is still left a bit murky – clearly Justice Thomas wanted to keep the opinion short. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:36 am
Bush (06-1196) and Al Odah v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm by Scott Bomboy
A divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the use of affirmative action in admissions programs at two universities was unconstitutional.Two cases were in front of the nine Justices: Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:58 am by Steve Lubet
 Justice Thomas has already made it quite clear that he will sit on politically charged cases notwithstanding his wife's activism, the ACA case (NFIB v. [read post]